Which option reflects a basic version control workflow?

Which option reflects a basic version control workflow?

• A. Delete the repository and recreate it.
• B. Rename files frequently to confuse history.
• C. Clone, commit, push, and pull to manage changes, including branching.
• D. Avoid using branches entirely.

Answer: (C)

A basic version control workflow centers on making changes locally, recording those changes as commits, and synchronizing with a remote repository while using branches to keep work organized and isolated. Cloning gives you a local copy to work with. You edit files, then stage and commit to capture a meaningful snapshot of your work with a message. Pushing sends your commits to the remote so others can see them, while pulling brings in changes from others and merges them into your copy. Branching supports developing features or fixes separately from the main line and can be merged back later. Deleting the repository and recreating it destroys history. Renaming files to confuse history breaks traceability. Avoiding branches blocks collaboration and makes it harder to manage multiple tasks at once.

A basic version control workflow centers on making changes locally, recording those changes as commits, and synchronizing with a remote repository while using branches to keep work organized and isolated. Cloning gives you a local copy to work with. You edit files, then stage and commit to capture a meaningful snapshot of your work with a message. Pushing sends your commits to the remote so others can see them, while pulling brings in changes from others and merges them into your copy. Branching supports developing features or fixes separately from the main line and can be merged back later.

Deleting the repository and recreating it destroys history. Renaming files to confuse history breaks traceability. Avoiding branches blocks collaboration and makes it harder to manage multiple tasks at once.